The main difference between the GC3 and GCQuad launch monitors from Foresight Sports is that the GCQuad uses four cameras instead of three. This gives the GCQuad a slight advantage in terms of accuracy, especially when tracking shots that are hit off-center.
The GCQuad also has a larger hitting zone than the GC3, which makes it more forgiving of mis-hits. Additionally, the GCQuad can track putting data, while the GC3 cannot.
Here is a table that summarizes the key differences between the GC3 and GCQuad:
|Number of cameras||3||4|
|Accuracy||Very accurate||Extremely accurate|
|Hitting zone||7″ x 10″||18″ x 14″|
|Putting data tracking||No||Yes|
Overall, the GCQuad is a more powerful and versatile launch monitor than the GC3. However, it is also more expensive. If you are looking for the most accurate and comprehensive launch monitor available, the GCQuad is the better option. However, if you are on a budget or do not need all of the features of the GCQuad, the GC3 is still a great choice.
Here are some additional considerations when choosing between the GC3 and GCQuad:
- Portability: The GC3 is more portable than the GCQuad. It is also easier to set up and use.
- Software: The GC3 and GCQuad use the same software, which is very powerful and user-friendly.
- Price: The GC3 is significantly less expensive than the GCQuad.
If you are not sure which launch monitor is right for you, it is a good idea to try both of them out and see which one you prefer.